OPINION OF STINSON MORRISON HECKER LLP
Published on June 26, 2008
Exhibit 8.1
June 26, 2008
Entertainment Properties Trust
30 West Pershing Road, Suite 201
Kansas City, Missouri 64108
30 West Pershing Road, Suite 201
Kansas City, Missouri 64108
Re: Entertainment Properties Trust: Registration Statement on Form S-3
Ladies and Gentlemen:
In connection with the registration statement on Form S-3, under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on or about the date hereof
(the “Registration Statement”), you have requested our opinion as to (i) the qualification of
Entertainment Properties Trust (the “Company”) as a real estate investment trust for U.S. federal
income tax purposes (a “REIT”) under the provisions of Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”); and (ii) the federal income tax status of the
Company’s Partnerships (as defined in an Officers’
Certificate dated June 26, 2008).
In connection with rendering this opinion, we have reviewed such
documents and made such inquiries as we have deemed appropriate for purposes of rendering this
opinion. In addition, the Company has delivered certain representations to us as set forth in an
Officers’ Certificate dated June 26, 2008 (the
“Officers’ Certificate”), and, with the Company’s
permission, we have relied upon such representations in giving this opinion. In rendering this
opinion, we have assumed, with your consent, that (i) the statements and representations set forth
in the the Registration Statement and the Officers’ Certificate are
true and correct, (ii) the Officers’ Certificate has been executed by appropriate and authorized
officers of the Company and (iii) no action will be taken by the Company that is inconsistent with
the Company’s status as a REIT for any period prior or subsequent to the date hereof. Although we
have not independently investigated the representations to us set forth in the Officers’
Certificate, nothing has come to our attention that would lead us to question the accuracy of any
representation contained in the Officers’ Certificate.
June 26, 2008
Page 2
Page 2
Based on the foregoing and in reliance thereon and subject to the qualifications below, it is
our opinion that: beginning with its taxable year ended December 31, 1997 and through the taxable
year ended December 31, 2007, the Company has been organized and operated in conformity with the
requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and
the Company’s current and proposed method of operation will enable the Company to continue to meet
the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT for subsequent taxable years; and the
Company’s current method of operation will enable the Partnerships (as defined in the Officers’
Certificate) to be treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as partnerships (or disregarded
entities) and not as associations taxable as corporations or as publicly-traded partnerships.
The opinions set forth in this letter are based on existing law as contained in the Code and
regulations promulgated thereunder, in effect on the date hereof, and the interpretations of such
provisions and regulations by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and the courts having
jurisdiction over such matters, all of which are subject to change either prospectively or
retroactively, and to possibly different interpretations. Also, any variation or difference in the
facts from those set forth in the Registration Statement or the
Officers’ Certificate may affect the conclusions stated herein. Moreover, the Company’s
qualification and taxation as a REIT depend upon the Company’s ability to meet, through actual
annual operating results, distribution levels and diversity of share ownership and the various
qualification tests imposed under the Code, the results of which have not been and will not be
reviewed by us. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the actual results of the Company’s
operations for any taxable year will satisfy such requirements.
This opinion represents our legal judgment, but it has no binding effect or official status
of any kind, and no assurance can be given that contrary positions may not be successfully
asserted by the Internal Revenue Service or a court shall not be construed as or deemed to be a
guarantee or insuring agreement. We disclaim any obligation to update this opinion for
developments which may occur subsequent to the date hereof. This opinion is solely for the
information and use of the addressee and may not be relied on or referred to by any other person
or entity without the express written consent of this firm.
We confirm the accuracy of the discussion under the captions “U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences” and “Legal Opinions” in the Registration Statement and Prospectus. We hereby consent
to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 8.1 of the Registration Statement and the reference to
our firm under the caption “Legal Opinions” in the prospectus that is a part of the Registration
Statement. In giving such consent, we do not thereby admit that we are in the category of persons
whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules
of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
June 26, 2008
Page 3
Page 3
| Best regards, | ||
| STINSON MORRISON HECKER
LLP /s/ Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP |